Engineering for Advanced Ceramics

Designing with advanced ceramics requires more than material knowledge — it requires deep process understanding, close collaboration, and engineering experience. We support our clients from the first sketch to fully optimized, cost-effective designs for ceramic manufacturing.

Backlit advanced ceramic part with a clear crack spanning several bores, illustrating a failure due to improper design
Avoid Costly Ceramic Failures Like This One ...
>> Partner With Our Experts To Engineer Your Parts Right The First Time<<

Why Designing for Ceramics Is Different?

Ceramics shrink during sintering — up to 30%. That shrinkage isn’t always linear; it depends on geometry, wall thickness, and how the part is supported during firing. Thin walls often shrink faster, and asymmetry can lead to distortion.
Customers often approach us with a part originally designed for metal. Simply keeping that design will usually not work. There are three key guidelines that must be considered:

Application requirements for advanced ceramic design – material selection, tolerances, quantity

What property does the application require?

The most critical functional demands of your application determine which ceramic material (or combination) we’ll use.

Dimensional tolerances for advanced ceramic parts - precision and manufacturing limits

Tolerances

The required dimensional tolerances define the shaping method. If tolerances below 0.1 mm are needed, hard grinding is the only viable solution.
Projected production quantity and scaling in advanced ceramic manufacturing

Projected quantity

Your expected production volume influences the manufacturing approach. 3D printing is ideal for prototypes and small batches, while increasing quantities make milling more economical.
Thin protruding feature on a ceramic part likely to break during milling

Avoid sharp, protruding features

In green machining, thin or unsupported structures are fragile and prone to breaking. During sintering, such features are likely to deform due to low rigidity. The only process that allows protrusions to some extent is hard grinding

Avoid thin and uneven wall thicknesses when designing advanced ceramics

Avoid thin and inhomogeneous wall thicknesses

Thin walls tend to shrink faster during sintering, leading to distortion. Maintain uniform wall thicknesses where possible, especially where walls meet.

If a transition between thin and thick sections is unavoidable due to design constraints, apply generous radii to soften the cross-sectional change and reduce stress concentration during sintering.

Minimize tensile stress

Ceramics can handle compressive stress up to 10 times better than tensile stress. Good design turns tension into compression wherever possible to increase durability.

Comparison of symmetric and asymmetric part design in ceramics, highlighting improved stress distribution through symmetry

Use symmetry

Symmetrical parts distribute sintering stresses evenly and help prevent warping or distortion.

Comparison of compact and elongated ceramic part shapes, showing that extreme aspect ratios reduce structural stability

Avoid extreme aspect ratios

Large differences in dimensions (e.g., length vs. width) reduce structural stability during sintering and promote deflection.

These values represent typical design limits for stereolithography-based 3D printing of technical ceramics. Actual feasibility may depend on part geometry and orientation. When in doubt, contact our engineering team.


VisualProperty / RequirementValue
3D schematic showing maximum printable part dimensions in X, Y, and Z directions for ceramic 3D printingBounding Box (max. part size)X: 74 mm / Y: 41 mm / Z: 80 mm
Semi-transparent rectangular part with a curved internal channel; red arrows indicate the smallest printable channel diameterSmallest printable channel1 mm
Cross-section of a semi-transparent printed part showing a short, straight hole with red arrows indicating the minimum printable diameter in thin wall sectionsSmallest printable hole in thin wall sections0.1 mm
3D-printed part with two red arrows indicating the maximum printable wall thickness in ceramicsMaximum wall thickness10 mm
Thin vertical wall printed without support, highlighted by red arrows to indicate the minimum printable free-standing wall thickness in ceramicsMinimum wall thickness (free)0.5 mm
Cylindrical wall printed vertically with red arrows indicating the minimum self-supported wall thickness in ceramic 3D printingMinimum wall thickness (self-supported, e.g. cylindrical tube)0.3 mm
Wall thickness highlighted by red dashed arrows, illustrating the optimal range for 3D-printed ceramic partsOptimal wall thickness1–3 mm
Horizontal surface with no support underneath, highlighted by red dashed arrows to show the maximum printable free overhang lengthFree overhang (without support structure)up to 2 mm
Double-sided unsupported overhang in a 3D-printed part, with red dashed arrows indicating a maximum printable span without supportFree overhang on both sides (without support structure)up to 3 mm
Unsupported overhang surface with red dashed lines and arrows illustrating the maximum printable free overhang angleMaximum free overhang angle (without support structure)70°
Two vertical printed features with red dashed arrows indicating the minimum required spacing between adjacent structures in ceramic 3D printingMinimum distance between features2 mm
illustration of Caliper and 3d printed cylindrical part, symbolizing general dimensional tolerances of 3d printed ceramic partGeneral tolerance±1.5 % (minimum ±0.15 mm)
Caliper measuring the diameter of a printed hole, representing achievable dimensional tolerance of bores in advanced ceramicsTolerance for bores±0.050 mm
Threaded bolt aligned with a printed internal thread inside a transparent part; red dashed arrows indicate the minimum printable thread size Smallest printable threadM2 or larger, ground thread recom.
Arrow pointing to horizontal printed surface to indicate in-layer surface roughness of ceramic partIn-layer roughnessRa 0.4
Arrow pointing to vertical surface of a 3d printed part to indicate layer-to-layer surface roughness due to build directionLayer-to-layer roughnessRa 1.5
Magnified view of voxel dimensions represented by red arrows inside a dashed box, illustrating the final 3d printed resolution after sinteringVoxel size after sintering38 µm

The following values represent typical limits for CNC milling of isostatically pressed ceramic green bodies. Actual feasibility depends on geometry, wall thickness, and required post-processing.


VisualProperty / RequirementValue
schematic showing the maximum part size for ceramic milling with red arrows indicating the X, Y, and Z dimensions inside a transparent bounding box.Max. part size (approx.)X: 400 mm / Y: 500 mm / Z: 300 mm
visualization of the smallest drillable hole in ceramic milling, showing a cylinder inside a transparent block with red arrows indicating the hole diameterSmallest drillable hole (approx.)0.05 mm
Diagram illustrating the diameter-to-length ratio of a drilled hole in ceramic milling, showing a narrow cylindrical hole inside a transparent block with red dashed lines indicating a aspect ratio.Drilled hole: Diameter/Length ratio (approx.)1:20
3D-rendered illustration showing the minimum wall thickness of a freestanding ceramic part during milling, with red arrows highlighting a thin vertical wall Minimum wall thickness (approx.)0.5 mm
3D-rendered image showing a cylindrical ceramic part with a caliper, illustrating general dimensional tolerance during milling of ceramicGeneral tolerance±1 % (minimum ±0.1 mm)
illustration of a metal bolt above a threaded hole in a ceramic block, indicating the smallest usable thread for millingSmallest usable threadM6 or larger, smaller threads must be ground
Illustration of a flat ceramic surface with a red arrow pointing to it, indicating typical as-fired surface roughness after millingSurface roughness (as-fired)Ra 1.5

These values represent typical in-house grinding
limits for high-precision technical ceramics. Feasibility depends on geometry, depth, material, and required tolerances. If you’re unsure, our engineering team can advise on achievable accuracy.


VisualProperty / RequirementValue
schematic showing the maximum part size for ceramic grinding with red arrows indicating the X, Y, and Z dimensions inside a transparent bounding box.Max. part size (approx.)X: 200 mm / Y: 300 mm / Z: 350 mm
Illustration showing the smallest grindable hole diameter on flat ceramic featuresMin. hole diameter (flat features, approx.)0.2 mm
Graphic indicating the minimum wall thickness achievable through precision grinding of ceramic partsMinimum wall thickness0.1 mm
3D illustration showing a single ceramic part with a cylindrical feature and a digital caliper above it, representing the general tolerance for prototype or small batch grinding processes.General tolerance (prototypes, testing, small batches)±5 µm
3D illustration showing multiple ceramic parts with cylindrical features and a digital caliper above them, representing the general tolerance for fully automated grinding of ceramic in production runsGeneral tolerance (fully automated production)±10 µm
3D illustration of a hexagonal bolt positioned above a transparent ceramic block with an internal thread, indicating the smallest grindable internal thread size for different ceramic materialsSmallest grindable internal threadAl₂O₃ and Si₃N₄ - M2 or larger

ZrO₂ - M1 or larger

3D illustration of a hexagonal bolt above a transparent ceramic block with internal threading, highlighting the minimum size for grindable external threads.Smallest grindable external threadM0.5 or larger
3D illustration showing a polished ceramic surface with flat and freefrom wavy contours. Two red arrows highlight the surface quality, indicating that mirror-polished finishes through precision grinding of ceramicSurface roughness (flat & freeform)surface finish down to Ra < 0.01 µm possible (mirror-polished)
3D illustration showing two cylindrical ceramic features standing on a shared base, with a red double arrow indicating the spacing between them. The image highlights minimum spacing requirements for deep features to avoid tapering caused by tool deflection during grinding of ceramic partMinimum feature spacing (deep features)4 mm, smaller spacing may result in tapering due to tool deflection

Choosing the Right Shaping Method

3D printing, milling, grinding, dry pressing, injection molding, there’s no single best method.
What matters is: What’s right for your part?
We help you find the best path based on geometry, tolerances, quantity, and surface requirements. Sometimes the answer is one process but often, it’s a smart combination.

Prototyping and Upscaling

If your ceramic part is intended for high-volume production, this is a common scenario:
A customer approaches us with a problem that needs to be solved using working prototypes. Once these are validated, he moves to a small functional batch — to make sure the chosen material and geometry actually work under real application conditions, before investing in tooling for injection molding or dry pressing.

We don’t (yet) offer injection molding or dry pressing in-house. Instead, we rely on a network of trusted partners, many of whom we’ve supported for years with prototyping and development services.

What matters is this: From day one, we keep the final production method in mind.
That means your prototype will already match — in geometry and material — what’s feasible and efficient in mass production.

Why High-Volume Production Is Not Our Focus

Large-scale ceramic manufacturing is about one thing: minimizing cost per part. That requires highly streamlined processes, a narrow part portfolio, and a company architecture optimized for throughput — not customer interaction. Our approach is different. We put engineering first. We ask questions, evaluate options, and optimize for function, not just cost.
That’s why we focus on complex geometries, low to mid volumes, and demanding specifications.

Design Affects Costs

We strongly recommend discussing your project with us before the final CAD model or assembly is finished — because design choices have a huge impact on cost. The price difference can easily be a factor of several times.
A few essentials:

  • Use ceramic only where needed:
    Ceramic is likely the most expensive component in your assembly. Limit it to parts where it’s truly essential.
  • Keep ceramics small — but not too tiny:
    Parts that are too small become difficult to handle. For additive manufacturing, keep in mind that price scales roughly with the cube of the part size.
    See our Online Pricing Tool for instant pricing.
  • Design for standard materials:
    Choose cost-effective grades like our Al₂O₃ where possible.
  • Avoid hard post-grinding through smart design:
    For example, design assemblies that don’t require precise fittings or post-machined interfaces.

As soon as you have a first draft of your part or assembly, that’s the perfect time to get in touch:

✉️ sales@hilgenberg-ceramics.com
or
(571) 758-5623